Compromising is
looking for expedient and mutually acceptable solution which partially
satisfies both parties.
When compromising may be applicable
- When the goals are moderate important and not worth the use of more assertive or more involving approach such as forcing or collaborating
- To reach temporary settlement on complex issues
- When you want to reach expedient solution on important issues
- As a first step when the involved parties do not know each other well or haven’t yet developed a high level of mutual trust
- When collaborating or forcing do not work.
Possible advantages of compromising
technique
- Faster issue resolution. Compromising may be more practical when time is a factor.
- Can provide a temporary solution while still looking for a win – win solution.
- Lowers the level of tension and stress resulting from the conflict
Disadvantages of compromising
technique
- May result in a situation when both parties are not satisfied with the outcome ( a loose – loose situation)
- Does not contribute to building trust in a long run
- May require close monitoring and control to ensure that the agreement are met.
No comments:
Post a Comment